
The military strikes against Iran have already drawn protests here in our state, with dozens gathering in Avon.
As cars passed by on Route 44 in Simsbury, protestors carried signs and banners, all with the same message: “No war with Iran.” Some of them feel President Trump is overstepping his authority as commander-in-chief.
“Not following the procedure of notifying Congress ahead of time. I don’t understand that,” Simsbury resident Jenny Euting.
Others are worried the U.S. would be dragged into a long conflict in the Middle East and believe it’s a distraction by President Trump to deflect from domestic issues like the Epstein files and affordability.
“We have an election coming in November, and he thinks this is going to help him. I don’t know,” another Simsbury resident, Renée Bradford, said.
The Connecticut Republican Party, however, applauded the strikes, adding that it’s about protecting the American people. They say the president “demonstrated the clarity and strength that the world so desperately needs.”
Trump has given multiple reasons as to why his administration decided to strike Iran, from destroying Iran’s nuclear program to regime change, the latter of which Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stepped back from.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Monday that there was an “imminent threat” to U.S. troops if Iran was attacked, so they acted “proactively.”
Quinnipiac University professor Anat Biletzki said that it is more reasonable, but she believes there could have been a different approach. She explained that forcing regime change from the outside almost never works.
“What was going on there was terrible, but no country can interfere in another country’s regime. and think it can take it apart and do it for it,” she said.
Biletzki said Trump is taking a political risk after campaigning on a platform of peace and seeking a Nobel Peace Prize.
“We don’t need to be cops of the world, and Trump promised that he would make peace all over the world, and that’s not what we’re seeing,” she said.






